In The Land of Blood and Honey, a movie by Angelina Jolie

December 19, 20117

by William Dorich


I preface this review by admitting that I am not a film critic—however, I have written six books on Balkan history and as a journalist, many of my articles have been published dealing with the Balkans, that have been reproduced in the International Herald Tribune, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times among others and published in the Serbian press for two decades.

In the Land of Blood and Honey, I wish to correct what I observed, especially the distortion of historic facts. I will leave the artistic side to those who are more qualified.  Sex, violence and fabrication appear alive and well in Hollywood as cinematic tricks are used to distract and “entertain” us.

Angelina Jolie wrote, directed and produced Blood and Honey. Jolie has unfortunately diverted our attention away from the facts regarding the Bosnian Civil War that she used as the backdrop for her exaggerated melodrama. She seems clueless that she plagiarized Shakespeare.

When Jolie went into this film production, she was fully aware of the emotional scars and personal losses of many Bosnian families, especially those of mixed marriages who will view this film. Pretending that her film is just make-believe but based on actual events, is a cop-out lacking responsibility—the kind of responsibility Jolie demands when human rights are violated.

Jolie arrogantly brushes aside the real Romeo & Juliet of Bosnia killed by a sniper on May 19, 1993. He was Bosko Brkic, a Bosnian Serb, and she was Admira Ismic, a Bosnian Muslim—they were assassinated as they tried to escape the Muslim side of Sarajevo by crossing the Vrbanja Bridge for safety on the Serbian side of the city. In their dying embrace they remained on that bridge for several days. The media, like vultures, manipulated their deaths and the ugly visual image for the benefit of their front page stories and nightly news.

But Jolie’s newest Romeo, Danijel, played by Serbian actor, Goran Kostic, and Juliet, Ajla, played by Muslim actress Zana Marjanovic, weaves a different story using sex, aggression and murder that perverts audiences’ senses into believing that violence, mistreatment and enslavement are supposed to represent a romance in the midst of an ethnic war. Granted, this is the prerequisite for a successful film today in Hollywood, and I acknowledge that the film was not intended to be a documentary, but, then again, propaganda always starts from this position.

The beginning of the film shows Ajla getting dressed for a date with a Serbian policeman. The following scene is of them dancing in a Sarajevo nightclub, meant to show a multi-ethnic city being shattered by a bomb blast, obviously launched by the Serbs. The next scene erupts with women being dragged onto a bus headed for what else? A Serb Rape Camp!  Little footage is wasted before these women are taken from the bus, and moments later, a Serbian policeman throws one of them over the hood of a vehicle, pulls down her pants and rapes her.  Next, the policeman grabs Ajla and proceeds to rape her when Danijel, her Serb love interest, prevents the rape and tells his fellow officer that she is not to be touched. Ajla survives the story locked in a room and only sleeps with Danijel. Why a young man would spend a war defending a woman with whom he only had one date, rings hollow in this plot. Turning that into another “Romeo & Juliet of Bosnia” comes off as rather naïve.

Jolie uses this Serbian bombing as the beginning of her film, ignoring the real start of the Bosnian Civil War when Muslim terrorists crashed into a Christian Serbian church during a wedding in Sarajevo, telling the guests that “Serbs were no longer allowed to display their centuries-old flag because Bosnia was now a Muslim country.” The thugs then shot and killed the father of the groom and seriously wounded the Serbian Orthodox priest and a dozen of the wedding guests.

Jolie omits any reference to the more than 2,000 Muslim terrorists who came to Sarajevo from Osama bin Laden’s training camps in Afghanistan and who tortured and executed a dozen Serbian soldiers by roasting them on spits like animals and decapitating dozens more. Then carried their severed heads around Sarajevo as trophies. My files contain several of those hideous photographs.

Jolie also cleverly omits the fact that thousands of Serbs were fired from their jobs including my friend who worked for Sarajevo Television for over 25 years. Muslims went throughout Sarajevo’s apartment buildings evicting Serb tenants who lived in those units for decades. After tossing Serb families out they threw their possessions out of the windows into the street. Jolie never touches on the fact that 250,000 Serbs were cleansed from Sarajevo and were forbidden to return to cast their ballots in the first Bosnian election in which Alija Izetbegovic won the presidency by only 44,000 votes. Any rationale for the Serbian retaliation including self-defense in this film was obviously left on Jolie’s cutting-room floor.

The Croats who fought the Bosnian Muslims for 4 years escaped notice and were made invisible in this film. The Bosnian Muslims were portrayed as innocent victims brutalized by overpowering Serb forces.

As I sat through this film, I was reminded of Peter Brock’s outstanding book, Media Cleansing: Dirty Reporting—Journalism and Tragedy in Yugoslavia, in which one chapter is entitled, “Only Muslim Victims, Only Serb Perpetrators.” This movie, much like the contemptible record of the partisan press that covered this Civil War, keeps reinforcing the lie that“300,000 Bosnian Muslims were killed.” Like Goebbels during the Holocaust who preached “Tell a lie a hundred times and it becomes the truth,” the lie of 300,000 deaths and 60,000 rapes was repeated by the media for 7 years, and the world was made to believe it.

Through reputable human rights organizations we now know that less than 97,000 victims were killed on all sides in these Balkan Civil Wars, hardly enough victims on any side to be considered “Genocide.” We also know that Jolie was fully aware of the 800,000 victims hacked to death in Rwanda two years earlier that Jolie managed to ignore. However, it appears she embraced any Bosnian propaganda that fit into her melodrama. Blood and Honey was nominated in the foreign film category, but I do not think many in Hollywood expect much from her film-directing debut.

The dialogue does briefly acknowledge Serb victims at The Battle of Kosovo in 1389, an historical event that will escape 99% of any audience viewing this film. Also, the casual mention of the Croatian Ustashe Nazi forces in WWII who liquidated 1.4 million Serbs, 60,000 Jews and 78,000 Roma Gypsies is connected with a “Chetnik” remark (Chetniks were the Serbs who fought the Nazis) that will escape her audience as well.

While the Serbian Orthodox church received its share of blame in the media and in this film, no connection is made to the late Serbian Patriarch Pavle who led over a million Serbs in protest marches that were the largest and longest in decades against the Milosevich government. During an interview with the Swiss Federal Parliament on December 10, 1992, the Patriarch told officials: “800 Serb women were documented as repeated rape victims in 20 camps operated by Muslims and Croats.” The patriarch also cited the Yugoslav State Commission for War Crimes on August 2, 1992—the same day Newsday’s “death camp” stories went on American newsstands that identified locations at Sarajevo, Tuzla, Bugojno, Bihac and Slavonski Brod where Serb women were confined, raped and murdered by Croat and Muslim soldiers.

The Romeo & Juliet “love story” wears thin before the film finally puts the audience out of its misery when Danijel shoots his Muslim lover Ajla in the head at point blank range.  The last scene of the film provides a final opportunity for Jolie to demonize the Serbian people as Danijel crawls to his knees before UN police and claims several times: “I am a War Criminal, I am a War Criminal,” a remark designed to remain in the minds of the audience as they leave the theater.

The film, however, does not embrace an audience; it stuns and bludgeons them with the rape issue. Jolie does not waste a good opportunity for full-blown propaganda by ending her film credits with various war-related statistics. In bold type one reads: “50,000 Bosnian rape victims,” a number that has long been discredited numerous times over the past dozen years. If this film is being presented as fiction, these statistical records were totally out of place and were used for political reasons.

The fabrications, partisan journalism and crude propaganda of the Bosnian Civil War by the international media can be summed up by one lone account from French journalist Jerome Bony, who described in a February 4, 1993 broadcast about his trek to Tuzla, which gained notoriety as the most prominent Bosnian town for finding Muslim rape victims:

“When I was fifty kilometers from Tuzla I was told to ‘go to the

Tuzla gymnasium (high school) there are 4,000 raped

women.’ At twenty kilometers, this figure dropped to 400. At ten

kilometers, only forty were left. Once at the site, I found only four

women willing to testify.”

The Land of Blood and Honey hemorrhages vulgarity with no “honey” to sweeten the pain of multi-ethnic violence in which all sides were responsible for war crimes in a three-sided Civil War.

Like the Kangaroo court in The Hague, Angelina Jolie’s film continues the process of condemning the Serbian people with collective guilt—denying them equal rights and equal justice as international political leaders continue to amputate portions of Serbian territory against her will and in violation of the UN Charter in which Serbia was a founding member; the Geneva Conventions, the Helsinki Final Act, and the NATO Treaty including violating UN Resolution #1244 that guaranteed Kosovo as sovereign Serbian territory as part of the peace agreement arranged by Richard Holbrooke. Surely, Jolie cannot be this ignorant?

Actor Jon Voight, Angelina Jolie’s father, attended Archbishop Stepinac High School in White Plains, New York, a school built in the 1950s and named after the Croatian Roman Catholic priest who was convicted by the allies of war crimes in WWII. He spent ten years in prison for his crimes against Serbs and Jews in Croatia, perhaps a clue to Jolie’s obvious anti-Serb bias.

If this film was meant to portray Ms. Jolie’s impressions of the recent Civil War, sadly she did not take advantage of her public persona to give the wounded and divided people of Bosnia a reason to heal. As a Serb, I left the screening appalled that once again the word “Serb” has been made synonymous with evil—It appears then that Blood and Honey is Angelina Jolie’s attempt at cinematic genocide.



William Dorich is the author of 6 books on Balkan history including his 1991 book, Serbian Genocide 1941-45 and his 1992 book, Kosovo. He is the recipient of The Order of St. Sava, the highest recognition given to a layperson by the Holy Synod of Serbian Orthodox Bishops; An Award of Merit from the Serbian Bar Association of America and a Freedom Award by RAS—The International Serbian Organization.

Posted on various national and international Serbian websites.

For more information about the Balkans and books offered by this writer visit:


Media Cleansing: Dirty Reporting, Peter Brock

Jasenovac Then & Now—A Conspiracy of Silence, Wm. Dorich

Kosovo is Serbia, Dr. Vojin Joksimovich

Hilandar Octocentenary, Wm. Dorich

Liar’s Poker, Michel Collon





7 Comments to “In The Land of Blood and Honey, a movie by Angelina Jolie”
  1. crveni says:

    I would add that there are spoilers about the film in the article. Other than that its an excellent article.

    The minute they had trouble recruiting Serbian actors to do the film you knew it was going to be ominous.

    The actors would only get to see the final version of the film at the premiere. It will be interesting to see what there reaction is now?

  2. [...] However, writer William Dorich managed a sneak pick in the UK and wrote a beautiful and honest review.  The Republik of Srpska, territory within Bosnia and Herzegovina, is trying to get the movie banned from ever playing in theatres there. Here is a clip from his review this is posted on Britić here: [...]

  3. Gogo says:

    This film is based on a true story. I personally know the lady that was kept a prisoner by a Serb soldier. She only told me a tiny bit of her suffering, which was enough pain for the rest of her life. The film, of course, has other aspects that are not based on the same story. I guess they call it ‘film art’ :) But, the Serbs were the bad boys in the Yugoslav wars and the sooner this fact is accepted the easier it will be. There will be many similar films with the Serbs as baddies. Some things have to be accepted as they are.

  4. aleks simic says:

    Gogo, you present your impression that “the Serbs were the bad boys in the Yugoslav wars” as a fact and suggest that Serbs should just accept that.

    I would suggest that the war was at least in part a function of external political influences. These are still prevelant today but they no longer affect a war they affect the writing of the history books about the war.

    We will need to wait a long time for those influences to lose interest in this part of the world before a balanced view can be obtained. Then Serbs will accept their share of the blame as they have already accepted the consequences.

    Your attitude towards the issue is simplistic and such attitudes only delay a balanced truth by destroying the demand for it.

  5. jj says:

    Gogo you can’t know “the lady that was kept a prisoner” because she wouldn’t be alive – according to those who saw the film she is shot in the head and killed at the end by the soldier because she had betrayed them (the soldiers’ location or something) after he’d told her how to get free.
    And if it were true there would actually be names to the people involved – like the mixed couple from Sarajevo who were actual termed the “Romeo and Juliet of Sarajevo”. They were shot dead as they were crossing a bridge to leave Sarajevo because the Serb man (boyfriend/fiance) was being seriously threatened by the Muslims and his life was in danger so he was leaving for Serbia and his Muslim fiancee chose to leave with him even though it was extreme risk.
    The Serb man thought he might have a chance because a powerful Muslim warlord whose men guarded the bridge had been a friend of his older brother growing up. But the warlord said, on the PBS documentary, after they’d been shot, that there were many other forces around/guarding the bridge that were not under his control.
    An independent Croat newspaper fingered a Bosnian Croat, Dragan Bozic, allied to the Muslim forces, as the actual shooter.

  6. Refuse to waste the money.I accept what William Dorich says.The disconnect most Americans have on this topic is shameful and Hollywood is one of the culprits.

  7. [...] However, writer William Dorich managed a sneak pick in the UK and wrote a beautiful and honest review.  The Republik of Srpska, territory within Bosnia and Herzegovina, is trying to get the movie banned from ever playing in theatres there. Here is a clip from his review this is posted on Britić here: [...]

Leave a Reply



Before you post, please prove you are sentient.

What\\\'s the capital of Serbia? (answer in Serbian, latinica)

  1. My Deda, the hero

  2. Hundreds turn out for Bedford Slava

  3. Minute’s silence for fallen heroes

  4. Entries sought for Miss Balkans UK

  5. BelTheatre to Visit the UK


Ana Ivanovic Dazzles At Dubai International Film Festival

Ana Ivanovic Dazzles At Dubai International Film Festival

Serbian tennis star Ana Ivanovic's team, the Micromax Indian Aces, is currently on top of the leaderboard after beating the Singapore Slammers to set the Dubai leg in motion. Prior the IPTL's first Dubai match, Ivanovic put on a...

Djokovic to feature in short film series

Made in partnership with Australian winery Jacob's Creek, they chart the 27-year-old's journey from war-torn Serbia and the dedication of his first coach Jelena Gencic, to his career-changing Australian Open and Wimbledon wins.

The Opposite of Memory is Not Forgetting

The Opposite of Memory is Not Forgetting

The opposite of memory is not forgetting. The opposite of memory is incoherence. The past is replayed in a way that enhances narratives of victimisation, and that reasserts the point that the Nation was always right/on the right side....

Princess Zorka tragedy inspired Gone With the Wind

Princess Zorka tragedy inspired Gone With the Wind

Tragic death of Serbian royal supposedly influence in famous scene in Hollywood epic Gone with the Wind.

Review and trailer: The November Man (12A) is a missed opportunity

Halloween Edition: An Incomplete Guide to Yugoslav and Post-Yugoslav Horror

Zagreb: Audience award for ‘No One’s Child’

Crowd-fund young filmmaker Gorana Jovanović’s new short


SO HOT WAS THE CANNON (Top Je Bio Vreo) Trailer

Ivan Ikić’s Varvari is an autopsy of the nihilism and destructiveness of teenage Serbians

Ivan Ikis Varvari is an autopsy of the nihilism and destructiveness of teenage Serbians


Gay hate jeopardised film about Serbia’s ‘lost’ generation

Monument To Michael Jackson – Official Trailer

First Serbian 3D film: The Fifth Butterfly

Serbian movie ‘No One’s Child’ triumphs in Venice

Gerard Depardieu: Serbia is a small big country

Serbia’s Oscar nominee: See You in Montevideo

Directors recognise talent of Serbian actor Marko Janketic


NESTAŠICA Opet nema petovalentnih vakcina

Prosvetari: Za sada nema dogovora, polugodište visi o koncu

Pre budžeta za 2015. još jedan rebalans

Šteta zbog nepovlačenja kredita 906 miliona dinara

Spremni na saradnju s Kinom na bazi koncesija

Diplomatska elita na konferenciji u Beogradu

Darko Rundek & Cargo Orkestar “Put u Sumrak”

Rusija može da se izbori s monetarnom krizom

Sistem oporezivanja u Srbiji neefikasan

GDE SE SAKRILA ZIMA I sutra temperatura do 12 stepeni

Switch to our mobile site